I checked the Wikipedia page and couldn't find anything. Could you do me a
favor and point me to the part of the article you're referring to, and/or
the cited source?

I'd rather solve this without more mailing list drama, if possible.
On Jun 20, 2013 9:06 AM, "Paul Johnson" <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:

> Check the Farm-to-market page on Wikipedia.
> On Jun 19, 2013 11:00 PM, "Clay Smalley" <claysmal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does the Wikipedia bit have a cited source? I can understand that being
>> true; I just want to verify. The Texas Highway Designation Files list them
>> as two separate types.
>> On Jun 19, 2013 8:25 PM, "Paul Johnson" <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>
>>> TxDOT is cited in Wikipedia as documenting them as being the same
>>> network (farm to market), and no RM and FM have the same number.  They just
>>> change the sign to RM when the route primarily passes through ranches
>>> instead of farms.  According to TxDOT, there is exactly one "Ranch Road",
>>> being RR 1, the rest are "farm to market."  It's definitely one of the more
>>> confusing aspects of the Texas highway system, sort of like the nebulous
>>> distinction between Park Roads and Rec Roads.
>>> On Jun 19, 2013 5:22 PM, "Clay Smalley" <claysmal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's US:TX:FM for FM roads, and US:TX:RM for RM roads. There may be
>>>> little to no overlap between RM and FM, and they may serve the same
>>>> purpose, but I see no need to go through them all and change all of them to
>>>> one network. They are different networks according to the state of Texas.
>>>> On Jun 19, 2013 12:52 PM, "Paul Johnson" <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Curious if the network for RM and FM is consistently US:TX:FM for
>>>>> both, since they're both part of the same network.
>>>>> On Jun 19, 2013 10:52 AM, "Clay Smalley" <claysmal...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Fortunately most of Texas has been done, but unfortunately the FM/RM
>>>>>> roads haven't been completed and there are quite a lot of them. I made a
>>>>>> Mapcraft to help add relations to them all:
>>>>>> http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/269
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've made a little progress in the Texas Panhandle but we definitely
>>>>>> need more people to help out if it's gonna get done.
>>>>>> On Jun 19, 2013 7:39 AM, "Paul Johnson" <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Martijn van Exel 
>>>>>>> <m...@rtijn.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for
>>>>>>>> some states, there are no State Route relation pages. (
>>>>>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations#See_also
>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm working on Oklahoma right now and keeping it documented.
>>>>>>>  Progress has been slow since I'm not satisfied in just slapping down
>>>>>>> relations, I'm checking each highway for continuity and connectivity as 
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> go along.  I've been going somewhat sequentially but if I come across a
>>>>>>> state highway I know goes through but things refuse to route down it 
>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>> I'm working, I'll go through and fine-tooth-comb it when I get back (as 
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> doing with OK 48 right now).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>>>>>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to