On 2015-06-13 17:08, Harald Kliems wrote:
Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only who
doesn't always change the tiger:reviewed tag when fixing TIGER-imported
roads. I don't know if that's technically feasible, but maybe it would
be better to check if a way has been modified since import, independent
of the tiger:reviewed tag. I guess you could assign those a slightly
lower priority than the ones that have tiger:reviewed=yes.

You aren't alone. I stopped bothering with tiger:reviewed tags back in the Potlatch 1 days. It just isn't a well-designed tag:

- not very discoverable to mappers who weren't around in 2008
- not automatic enough
- doesn't say whether the names, classification, or geometry was reviewed, or whether the review covered the entire way

I think we generally treat tiger:* tags as cruft these days. (I sometimes use tiger:name_* in cleaning up erroneously merged ways or ways lossily "unduplicated" along county lines, but that's about it.)

On the other hand, ways without tiger:reviewed tags are more likely to have been entered by hand or rigorously reviewed, so it does make sense to reward such ways. But I think it'd be unfortunate to totally discount tiger:reviewed=no ways.

FWIW, I also leave a lot of usable paved roads as highway=residential in rural areas, but there are plenty of considerations that vary from region to region (even within a state).

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM Richard Fairhurst
<rich...@systemed.net
<mailto:rich...@systemed.net>> wrote:

    Hi all,

    At State of the Map US last weekend I was really pleased to unveil
    bicycle routing for the US (and Canada) at my site, cycle.travel
    <http://cycle.travel>.

    The planner, at http://cycle.travel/map , will plan a bike route for you
    between any two points - whether in the same city or on opposite sides
    of the continent. It's all based on OSM data but also takes account of
    elevation and other factors.

    I "dogfooded" it with a three-day ride around New York state after
    SOTM-US, and it found me some lovely quiet roads in and around the
    Catskills. I hope it'll be equally useful for the other two-wheelers
    amongst us. There's still a lot I want to add (as detailed at
    http://cycle.travel/news/new_cycle_travel_directions_for_the_us_and_canada)
    but I hope you enjoy it.

    Plug aside, there's a couple of things might be relevant to US mappers.


    First of all, I'm aiming high with this - the aim isn't just to make the
    best OSM-powered bike router of the US, but the best bike router full
    stop for commuters, leisure cyclists and tourers. (I leave the
    "athletes" to Strava!)

    Here in Britain, experience over the years has been that good bike
    routing and good bike cartography - historically via CycleStreets and
    OpenCycleMap - are a really effective way of driving contributions to
    OSM. So if you know cyclists who aren't yet contributing to OSM, maybe
    throw this at them - and if it doesn't find the route they'd recommend,
    maybe there's some unmapped infrastructure they could be persuaded
    to add!


    Second, the routing and cartography both heavily distrust unreviewed
    TIGER.

    In other words, it won't route over a rural road tagged as
             highway=residential
             tiger:reviewed=no

    Any road with tiger:reviewed removed or altered, any road in urban
    areas, and any road with highway=unclassified or greater is assumed to
    be a usable paved road. (There are a few additional bits of logic but
    that's the general principle.)

    Unreviewed rural residentials are shown on the map (high zoom levels) as
    a faint grey dashed line, explained in the key as "Unsurveyed road".

    I've been finding this a really useful way of locating unreviewed TIGER
    and fixing it... it's actually quite addictive. :) Looking for roads
    which cross rivers, or with long sweeping curves, is an easy way of
    identifying quick wins. My modus operandi is to retag 2+-lane roads with
    painted centrelines as tertiary, smaller paved roads as unclassified,
    and just to take the tiger:reviewed tag off paved residential roads.
    Anything unpaved gets a surface tag and/or highway=track.

    I can't promise minutely updates I'm afraid - the routing/map update
    process takes two full days to run so it'll be more monthly than
    minutely. But I hope you find it as useful as I do. You'll see there's a
    tiny little "pen" icon at the bottom right of http://cycle.travel/map
    which takes you to edit the current location in OSM.


    Finally, many thanks to everyone who's tested it so far, particularly
    Steve All - your feedback was and continues to be enormously useful.

    cheers
    Richard

    _______________________________________________
    Talk-us mailing list
    Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
    <mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



--
m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us


_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to