Minh Nguyen writes: > You aren't alone. I stopped bothering with tiger:reviewed tags back in > the Potlatch 1 days. It just isn't a well-designed tag: > > - not very discoverable to mappers who weren't around in 2008
Makes ways a sickly yellow if you edit using JOSM. > - doesn't say whether the names, classification, or geometry was > reviewed, or whether the review covered the entire way I remove it when I've checked (usually via field survey, but sometimes when someone else that I know has been there) that the name is correct, and ensured that the geometry is correct. I used to just remove tiger:reviewed, but now I remove all the tiger: tags. > But I think it'd be unfortunate to totally discount > tiger:reviewed=no ways. I think the usual thing to do is check to see if DaveHansenTiger is still the owner. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us