Greg Troxel wrote: > It's perfectly reasonable to have an unpaved highway=secondary in > rural areas, if that's one of the major roads around.
...with the proviso that it _must_ be tagged as surface=unpaved (or a more detailed tag, such as surface=gravel or surface=dirt). Standard tagging in developed countries is that such roads are assumed paved unless otherwise specified. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Another-road-classification-disagreement-this-time-with-HFCS-in-Kansas-tp5854071p5855178.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
