On 9/6/15 12:49 PM, richiekenned...@gmail.com wrote: > I am the editor in question. > > The discussion appears to assume that roadway design conveys type. I > do not necessarily agree. > > However, I can see where some roads with a high HFCS classification > may warrant a class downgrade. US 24 in Central Kansas obviously > connects mainly smaller towns, whereas US 54 (which I had just > re-classed as trunk a few days ago) connects larger towns and cities. > > I would suggest the following guidance for rural HFCS: > using HFCS has never been a normal practice for OSM. i don't think it's rational to impose HFCS derived classification on the US road grid at this point in time.
in any case, it is something that should be discussed before changing tags. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
