Eric Ladner <eric.lad...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:58 AM Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: > >> >> Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > OK, 'residential' if it looks like 'subdivision', 'unclassified' >> > otherwise (as long as it's drivable in, say, my daughter's car rather >> > than my 4-wheeler). Got it. >> >> I also see a distinction between residential/unclassified as denoting a >> legal road (around me, carved-out parcel wise from the surrounding land) >> vs track and some service denoting a non-legal-road. However, others >> see the physical and legal attributes as separate. >> > My understanding of the description of "unclassified" is unclassified is a > step between residential and tertiary. It's a connecting road, minor > connector, whatever, that doesn't have residential on it, but it's not high > enough in classification to make it a tertiary road.
I agree with that notion. > I usually use it for roads in industrial complexes, loops around malls, > business complexes, or other connectors/roads where there's no obvious > residential around. Mostly agree, but I only use it for legal roads, not driveways or private roads. Meaning someplace where (in new england) it's legally separate and the public has a right of access.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
