speaking of screen readers / synthesizers, I began with studying in a
computer class, who's instructor's idea was accessability, with two of
us who had screen readers; (1) apple, (that was me) and (2) dos, my
friend Doug.
I never evolved into anything Apple after I left the class, but I do
remember their screen reading software was "outspoken," and actually had
a decent sounding synthesizer.
I got an IBM XT, but then almost immediately since I couldn't get the
screen reader to work, I got a 16Mhz 386 machine which I still have. Dos
screen readers' first, Artic/Vision with it's particular synthesizer,
but then I got a KPR, (Kurzweil personal reader), and then began using
it through the serial port with Vocal Eyes, or ASAP.
Wow, those were the days! I ran a BBS in Sacramento for almost 6 years
using that machine, only upgrading the hard drive to a 100Megabyte one.
What is truly amazing is is that the algorithms, (most of them) for
DetTalk access 32 which is now still a "modern" synthesizer, was evolved
in the very early eighties, wasn't it?
Seems to me that may be the case, correct me if I am wrong.
That old KPR still exists, and will work as a synthesizer if I wanted it
too. :) I wish we could choose another "lively" parameter for the
DecTalk Access 32, as we could using the KPR up to 250 percent, in the
first evolution of the firmware. :)

-- 
Curtis Delzer <curtis1...@verizon.net>

On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 22:25:55 -0500
Tom Fairhurst via Talk <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote:

> I learned Dos WordPerfect for my job in 1988. My first computer was a laptop 
> from Computer Aids Corporation. It has ScreenTalk One of the first loaded on 
> it ready to go. One of the first programs I installed on it was WordPerfect. 
> I even read through a DOS manual with an Optacon. I bought my first desktop 
> from GW micro. It was a Pentium, and I was so proud. Incidentally, I used for 
> a new job. Later, when I was able to use a company computer, I took my PC 
> home and used it for a couple of years.
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Marvin Commerford via Talk
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 8:22 PM
> To: David Goldfield ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Screen Reader History
> 
> 
> And now Doug and Dan are with their third company together.  I remember
> that I really wanted a Sounding Board from Computer Aids Corporation
> which Dan designed.  For a short time I was sad when I learned that CA
> had closed down.  Doug and Dan got GW Micro rolling and the first thing
> I did when I got my first IT job was to order that Sounding Board,
> Vocal-Eyes 1.0, their Braille Talk braille translation program, and the
> Noteworthy and calcworthy programs they had.  GW's products really
> helped make it possible for me to earn a good living.
> 
> On 8/2/2015 7:30 PM, David Goldfield via Talk wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > Thank you for sharing that amazing piece of history. There are so many
> > products which we use on a daily basis and we know little about the
> > product's origins and its inventors. I believe that someone started an
> > assistive technology history wiki and your story should definitely be
> > submitted. Is Malcom still with us?
> >
> > David Goldfield,
> > Assistive Technology Specialist
> >
> > Feel free to visit my Web site
> > www.davidgoldfield.info
> >
> > On 8/2/2015 8:21 PM, Jeff Samco via Talk wrote:
> >> In 1985 I bought a used IBM PC with the same 256 KB of memory and 2
> >> double-sided floppy disk drives for only $3,000. I worked for the
> >> National Park Service in Yosemite and a coworker of mine, Malcom
> >> Holser, wrote a screen reader program for me to use with an Echo PC
> >> serial synthesizer. Malcom came up with the name Vocal-Eyes and later
> >> sold the program to Computer
> >> Aids Corporation. However, they were strict on including the word
> >> "talk" in most all their software so it became Screen Talk. Later, I
> >> was pleased when GW Micro picked up and used the name Vocal-Eyes.
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >> At 03:51 PM 8/2/2015, you wrote:
> >>> I got my first IBM clone (256K of RAM) at this time in 1985, and was
> >>> running Screen-Talk before Computer Aids Corporation added the Prokey
> >>> macros. A SET file was about 128 bytes long, and I edited some of
> >>> them with Edlin for better compatibility with my Votrax Personal
> >>> Speech System. Many times I'm amazed that this Windows stuff works at
> >>> all.
> >>> Windows 3.1 came out in 1990, and the first screen reader for Windows
> >>> was OutSpoken, which was first demonstrated in July of 1992.
> >>> Window-Eyes for Windows 3.1 came out in 1995, and it could first run
> >>> Windows 95 in 1997.
> >>>
> >>> Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Kensington, MD
> >>> http://lras.home.sprynet.com
> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Butch Bussen via Talk
> >>> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 2:49 PM
> >>> To: Pamela Dominguez ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> >>> Subject: Re: A new feature in Internet Explorer
> >>>
> >>> Such memories, got my first Apple 2 e in 1983.  Anyone remember file
> >>> talk?  Got an ibm clone in 85 and ran screen talk with prokey.
> >>> 73
> >>> Butch
> >>> WA0VJR
> >>> Node 3148
> >>> Wallace, ks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 2
> >>> Aug 2015, Pamela Dominguez via Talk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I started out with artic vision, and for a short time, I had a
> >>>> computer that I was supposed to get if I got a job that had vocal
> >>>> eyes on it.  But I was so used to the Artic that I didn't like the
> >>>> vocal eyes.  Yes, diskettes, the five inch soft ones and the
> >>>> 3.5-inch ones.  Somewhere, I still have them! Pam.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Thomas N. Chan via Talk
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 4:12 AM
> >>>> To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
> >>>> Subject: RE: A new feature in Internet Explorer
> >>>>
> >>>> I also started during the 90s when vocal-eyes was the king of dos,
> >>>> wordperfect.... let's see, are we talking about diskettes here? lol....
> >>>> This is really back from the past
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --------------------
> >>>> regards
> >>>> Thomas N. Chan
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Talk
> >>>> [mailto:talk-bounces+thomas.nchan=gmail....@lists.window-eyes.com]
> >>>> On Behalf
> >>>> Of Tom Kingston via Talk
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, 2 August 2015 8:12 AM
> >>>> To: gary melconian; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> >>>> Subject: Re: A new feature in Internet Explorer
> >>>>
> >>>> You might want to check your timeline. 25 years ago I was using GW
> >>>> Micro's VocalEyes on DOS and there was no such thing as Windows.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sheesh! Now I suddenly feel old. Thanks a bunch. (grin)
> >>>>
> >>>> Tom
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/1/2015 7:40 PM, gary melconian via Talk wrote:
> >>>>>  Sure we will. I appreciate the products that I have used from GW
> >>>>> over the
> >>>>>  past 25 years of using windows eyes from 4.0 all the way up to 9.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>  From: Talk
> >>>>>  [mailto:talk-bounces+gmelconian619=gmail....@lists.window-eyes.com] 
> >>>>> >>>>> On
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Behalf Of Stephen Clark via Talk
> >>>>>  Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 12:58 PM
> >>>>>  To: Window-Eyes Discussion List <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
> >>>>>  Subject: A new feature in Internet Explorer
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Here is a feature that they've added to Internet explorer which is
> >>>>> turned
> >>>> on
> >>>>>  by default called "Do not track".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/internet-explorer/ie-do-not-track
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  It's not perfect, but they are actually trying to improve the
> >>>>> security of
> >>>>>  Windows not make it worse.
> >>>>
> >>>>>  Now, can we please get back to talking about Window-eyes?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  ==Steve
> >>>>>  _______________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> >>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> >>>
> >>> For membership options, visit
> >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/jsamco%40jps.net.
> >>>
> >>> For subscription options, visit
> >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >>> List archives can be found at
> >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> >> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> >>
> >> For membership options, visit
> >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/david.goldfield%40outlook.com.
> >>
> >> For subscription options, visit
> >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >> List archives can be found at
> >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> > author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> >
> > For membership options, visit
> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/mcommerford%40comcast.net.
> >
> > For subscription options, visit
> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> > List archives can be found at
> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/tfairhurst%40kc.rr.com.
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/curtis1014%40verizon.net.
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to