I think it's unlikely that such a take over will happen for this vote. But the PSC should take into account the possibility in future votes, and come up with some simple and non-onerous criteria for project membership and voting rights in the future. The PSC would also need to set timing for future elections.
== Mikel Maron == http://mapkibera.org/ +254 (0) 724899738 [email protected] ________________________________ From: Brian Russo <[email protected]> To: Schuyler Erle <[email protected]> Cc: OAM List <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 1:23:52 AM Subject: Re: [OAM-talk] PSC Voting I agree with Schuyler, I don't think it's like we're going to have some special interest group coming in to take over the project. The more bureaucracy we create off the mark the less likely it is anything material will result IMO. -1 - bri On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Schuyler Erle <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:17 -0800, John Crowley wrote: >>> >>> Voting usually entails knowing the number of people who can cast >>> ballots. How will the community 'register' voters? And how will voters >>> know the various qualifications of candidates? Could the wiki be used >>> as a simple hack: members could register on one page; candidates could >>> give their bios and other qualifications on another? > >>I think a simple qualification of "already being on the mailing list as >>of when the vote was proposed" should be sufficient. I am -0 on this >>suggestion. > >>I did start a page on the wiki under >http://wiki.openaerialmap.org/Project_Stakeholders but then changed my >>mind, so sign up or disregard that page as you please until we come to >>some kind of consensus. > >>SDE > > >>_______________________________________________ >>talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
