On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 00:30 +0000, 80n wrote:
> Lars
> Thanks for this info, its been very useful.
>
> Some edits, that were made during the period when the incremental
> feeds were down, have not been resynchronized correctly.
>
> The problem is due to a difference in the timestamp format between the
> planet dump and the incremental feeds.
>
> I'll fix the resync script and re-run it.
>
> 80n
I thought they both used the same format:-
$ gzip -dc /home/www/tile/direct/planet/planet-080312.osm.gz | grep timestamp |
head -n 3
<node id="2" lat="50.1360074" lon="8.3023717"
timestamp="2007-10-04T18:28:37Z">
<node id="4" lat="51.5220733" lon="-0.1458135"
timestamp="2007-01-29T08:48:14Z"/>
<node id="11" lat="4.0840331" lon="73.5129514"
timestamp="2006-11-04T18:15:03Z">
$ bzip2 -dc daily-20080307-20080308.osc.bz2 | grep timestamp | head -n 3
<node id="122329" timestamp="2008-03-07T07:33:53Z" user="mbuege"
lat="53.5374636" lon="10.0309499"/>
<node id="122330" timestamp="2008-03-07T07:43:48Z" user="mbuege"
lat="53.5369426" lon="10.0339214"/>
<node id="122331" timestamp="2008-03-07T07:27:15Z" user="mbuege"
lat="53.5389492" lon="10.0325114"/>
I can see the order of the attributes is different and the diffs contain
the user, but the timestamp looks the same format to me. Or do you mean
the timestamp in the filename?
Jon
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
