On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Inge Wallin wrote: > Yes, but it would be good if we planned for at least some of the subsequent > levels right from the start.
I support this idea - I would call them levels as some areas might work completely different. I would call the different completenesses like roadcomplete cyclewaycomplete roadnamecomplete landusecomplete etc ... I have no idea about the granularity but in the end it comes down to a map never containing ALL interesting data but it would be interesting to note which subset it contains or is complete. The completeness is more or less a feeling of the primary mapper of this specific area so it should be taken with a grain of salt i guess. But this information would be interesting for a map bug tracker which could assign higher prioritys to bugs in "complete" areas or even refuse to accept bugs in incomplete areas. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134 Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk