On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 06:40:59AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote: > > > > So personally I think duplicate keys would be the easiest and best way to > > tag such double-uses. > > > > Norbert > > > > Just make two different nodes, each located closest to the amenity > concerned. There's nothing that makes it non-routable. It's just a > point--the routers will get you as close to the point on the road as > possible. The addr: property definitely isn't going to help in making it > routable. >
Well - apart from the fact that it actually makes it difficult to render properly (things tend to overlap), it's not correct either. In many cases, the supermarket *is* the post-office, at least here in Norway. It might be implemented with a separate counter, but other places perhaps it might be different. And likewise, with oter dual-use amenities... While I for now use the dual-node mechanism, I don't like it because of the above reason. -- - Vegard Engen, member of the first RFC1149 implementation team. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
