On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Norbert Wenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karl Newman wrote: > >> Just make two different nodes, each located closest to the amenity >> concerned. There's nothing that makes it non-routable. It's just a >> point--the routers will get you as close to the point on the road as >> possible. The addr: property definitely isn't going to help in making it >> routable. >> > > You're right with the addr: property, that was not well thought from my > side. But I'd nevertheless prefer the double amenities, just because the > that's what those nodes are. One building or machine with multiple uses at > the very same place. > > Norbert > I understand your concern about overlapping icons, but in a device such as a GPS, it will be considered as two separate points of interest (POI), because it really is two different services (or amenities or whatever); they just happen to be at the same location. Karl
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
