I can't see how any plan that involves deleting non-trivial amounts of data is ever going to work anyway as who is going to stop people from re-uploading the data with minor changes to tags and all the nodes moved by a metre or two?
Kevin Ed Loach wrote: > I wrote: > >> As I think someone else pointed out, if it is abusable then we >> could abuse it and not lose any data with the switch. > > And before the flood of emails - I forgot the smiley. > > I'm sure I read somewhere lots of suggestions about what would > happen to various items based on whether the people who created > it/amended it agreed to the new licence or not, but can't find > where. Was it in the wiki or on an email list? Can anyone remember. > > Anyway, I don't understand all these legal aspects. I joined the > project to help improve the map and will continue to do so whether > the licence changes or not, hoping that those people who do know > what they are talking about are acting in the best interest of the > project. > > Ed > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
