Mike asked for examples of "basic physical status".

1) Path - poorly-defined path (either because of low usage, or because
there's no advantage in taking any particular line, or because someone's
ploughed it)

2) Footway - well-defined, but not suitable for horses, due to accesses
(stiles / kissing gates), and vulnerability of surface to damage from heavy
animals. Most UK country footpaths fall into this category. Category also
covers urban made-up ways from which cycles are specifically banned. Some
are designated public footpaths.

3) Bridleway - well-defined, and usage by horses accepted, with gates for
access. Surface unlikely to be made-up, and likely to be unusable by
cyclists, especially in woods, and especially after rain. Routing a bike on
such a way wouldn't be clever. Most UK country bridleways fall into this
category, but not urban ones.

4) Cycleway - surface made up and fairly smooth. Probably no objection to
horses using it occasionally, though situation likely to be unclear unless
it's legally a Bridleway, or there's some horse-unfriendly gates. Possibly
occasional access for farm vehicles / cars. Legal designation could be just
about anything - so long as the landowner doesn't mind. Might be a case for
narrow cycleways to be coded as cycle&footway, to show you will probably
have to cycle differently, and to avoid claiming undue ownership/priority
for cyclists.

5) Track - surface made up though may be a bit rough, and may have grass
growing down the middle. Probably no formal access restrictions, though hard
work for cyclists, and could well damage a normal car. Landowner may limit
access. Also covers forest tracks, though surface likely to be less well
made up, and prone to being impassable for some vehicles in wet conditions.
Legal designation could be anything or nothing.

The general point is that legal designation and physical status don't always
align.

Richard (not the one responsible for Potlatch)
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to