On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:31:46AM +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > It is correct to discuss. > There SHOULD be a landuse tag for every area as far as I am concerned, > and since landuse=forest is for managed wooded areas, it is incorrect to > use that for unmanaged areas. So perhaps we just need to CORRECT the > land use page to include unmanaged woodland in some way? > Having a mixture of 'natural' AND 'landuse' seems to be the basic > problem .... so none of the proposed fixes is correct! These areas ARE > landuse=wood
Currently landuse does not list a wood but only a forest and says explicitly: "For areas of land used by people. For natural areas, see Key:natural. " So it should be natural=wood not landuse=wood. As you say - its an unmanaged forest so its not people usage so landuse is the wrong tag. Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org +49-171-2280134 Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk