On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:59:48AM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Hold on there. Defined? defined by whom. If you mean its in map features > > then that's cool because I put them there :-D > > On the other hand Map Features isn't a rule book or a prescribed standard. > > Its guidance on how you might like to tag. landuse=wood is perfectly correct > > in English. It means it's a piece of land been used for managed woodland to > > my mind. That's not the same as forest. It might not translate the same for > > you but that's cool. I wouldn't be asking you to accept the tag is correct > > in your eyes, but I am asking you to respect it could be in mine. > > It might be that for you landuse=wood is managed woodland.
It is for me too, I just happen to have tagged none yet. If I ever tag a managed wood that I don’t consider to be either a forest or unmanaged woodland, I will tag it as landuse=wood. > wiki says the opposit and thats what people use to understand > the tags. Re‐quoting Andy on Map Features (it applies to the rest of the wiki too): > > On the other hand Map Features isn't a rule book or a prescribed standard. > > Its guidance on how you might like to tag. Fortunately, the wiki is a wiki, so for those who like to take the wiki as prescribed, see landuse=wood[1]. [1]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dwood Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
