Lulu-Ann wrote:
> User Dieterdreist has changed the description so the highway tag is 
> no longer used for the objective physical description but for a subjective 
> feeling of "importance". Millions of highway tags would need to be 
> reviewed if this change without proposal and approval would become valid.

Dieterdreist isn't far from being right. "Importance" is what the highway
tag was created for, and in fact that's more what Map Features originally
said. Where I'd differ is that it's not a "subjective feeling" - it should
be verifiable, often by reference to your country's highway system.

Objective physical descriptions are good. But you shouldn't use the highway
tag for them: that can't ever work. Combinations of physical attributes vary
so wildly between countries that you'd end up with 200 different values for
the highway tag. That would be a nightmare for renderers and routers to
parse.

Rather, you should add unambiguous physical tags like surface=, lanes=, that
sort of thing. That way, those routers and renderers that need them can
reliably parse the information. If your editor of choice doesn't make it
easy to enter such tags, then nag the authors until it does (did I really
say that? :) ).

Fortunately, any edit war here shouldn't make any difference either way to
how anyone maps, and there's no need for retagging. This is because the best
authority for "what highway value should I use?" is, in fact, the
"International equivalence" table on the wiki. This documents, at least in
theory, the consensus within your country: for example, in the UK, we've had
a settled set of definitions for several years now and they are summarised
in the International equivalence table. You should map according to that.

(Wiki Actually Useful Shock Horror!)

cheers
Richard
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/New-dimension-of-vandalism-tp25150223p25151132.html
Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to