On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, David Earl <da...@frankieandshadow.com> wrote: > On 10/09/2009 01:11, Roy Wallace wrote: >> >> But I would support any proposal that merges these and includes >> complementary tags to explicitly specify differences as necessary. > > Does it really matter? Just treat them as synonyms.
Having two different ways to tag a particular entity is not the best solution when building a database, IMHO. > Or adopt a rule which > says if a church is in the middle of it it is a graveyeard and if not it is > a cemetery. I'm not sure what suggesting. The goal here is a set of tags and a corresponding set of definitions. I have suggested that amenity=cemetery be used for places where people are buried, with further details given by cemetery:*=* as necessary (and if affiliated with a place_of_worship, related with a relation). Have you got an alternative suggestion? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
