> Camp three: multiple ways representing paths of travel, grouped with a > "bridge" relation to indicate they share a common bridge. This could > probably be seen as a compromise, and is (I think) a good interim > solution, if not a very-long-term solution. >
I can suggest to add bridge's physical form to this. Otherwise yeah, why not. It would also help to indicate where bridge actually starts and ends to help routing software logic. Cheers, Peter. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
