Hi, Stefan de Konink wrote: >> including but not limited to OpenStreetMap.) > > Interesting that you point it out that way. Because this is exactly not > what I've been perceiving when talking to the board members. I actually > think 'exclusively' might be a better representation of real life.
That's because OpenStreetMap is the only thing they are concerned with in real life; all of them have been involved with OSM before they came to OSMF. I think that if you could prove to OSMF that backing a non-OSM project in some part of the world would actually do more for the goal of free and open maps than backing OSM in that same area - perhaps because a community already exists or so - then OSMF would have to do that. Or change their articles of association ;-) Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
