On 24 November 2010 23:11, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Ed Avis wrote: >> >> Well, since there is a licence discussion anyway, how about it? What >> would >> Microsoft and others like to see from OSM's licence? It would be great to >> have >> some concrete preferences from the most important users. > > .... > > 2. The license train has left the station. We've been at this for ages and > there is no viable alternative. We will certainly not throw away years of > deliberations just because a handful of US corporations asked us to (and > imagine the outcry among mappers if we were to do that). >
As a note... LWG minutues from 18th/25th May 2010 has ODbL discussion with Microsoft/Bing. https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_63fshs97dc https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_64gvwsr8gq / Grant _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
