Elizabeth Dodd <ed...@billiau.net> wrote: > You forgot to say that "talk" is for matters that mappers wish to > discuss with the whole community. > Perhaps you could respect this and stop hiding stuff which is > important on legal-talk where there are fewer subscribers than on > talk.
I don't say much here, but I do agree with Richard (and others). I haven't decided 100% about the license, and for that reason I follow the legal-talk list. Reading the talk list here always goes like this: Interesting topic and question raised, someone finds a reason to mention the license change, most of the thread from there is bitching about the license change. What I do, is read a few replies, discover the license bitching and then select "Ignore thread" because I don't always want to read about the license, there are other issues too. Unfortunately I mostly miss the real and good answers to discussions, because I end of ignoring 90% of the threads. Sometimes when I do want to catch up on the license, I read talk-legal - and this might only be a few times a week. If I am the only one who acts like this, then feel free to ignore me. But if this is somewhat common behaviour, then the talk list is in big trouble. - Johnny _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
