On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, gianfranco gliozzo <gfrem...@gmail.com> wrote: > Most of the things you are discussing about can be done in the > LinkingOpenData (LOD) environment where you have ontologies dealing with > almost every kind of human knowledge. In the LOD there are already several > linguistic resources, some of them multilingual. > I already developed and tested the feasibility of a SPARQL query expansion > using linguistic resources published online. > The main bottleneck between OSM and semantic web is constituted by the > semantic translation of OSM itself. > The OSM database looks poorly expressive semantically and the first semantic > translation of OSM, LinkedGeoData already published in the LOD, while trying > to overcome some deficiencies needs further development from my point of > view. > Gianfra
Gianfranco, Can you elaborate on that last point you make? How is OSM lacking in terms of semantic expressiveness? Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org laziness – impatience – hubris http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ twitter / skype: mvexel flickr: rhodes _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk