2011/2/9 Daniel Sabo <daniels...@gmail.com>: > This is probably a holdover from "old style" multipolygons that were defined > by the tags on the outer ways and had no tags on the relations. But putting > tags on both the way and the relation would be wrong anyways, because the > renderer can't know that boundary on the way is the same boundary on the > relation.
This depends on the situation. Say you are mapping a public square with a (separately as an area mapped) monument in the middle. Obviously you would need a multipolygon relation, because the highway-area should not cover the monument. But the name of the square should IMHO remain on the way, because the whole square has this name, including the monument. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
