Agreed. What I mean is that if there are tags that apply to the multipolygon itself they should be only on the multipolygon. In your example the monument would be an inner way of the multipolygon and shouldn't have any tags related to the public square, but it would also be a monument, and the tags for the monument would belong on the monument's way.
- Daniel On Feb 9, 2011, at 5:07 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2011/2/9 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: >> This depends on the situation. Say you are mapping a public square >> with a (separately as an area mapped) monument in the middle. >> Obviously you would need a multipolygon relation, because the >> highway-area should not cover the monument. But the name of the square >> should IMHO remain on the way, because the whole square has this name, >> including the monument. > > but I agree, you will have to set "area=yes" as well on the way, > because otherwise the renderer can not know that the name is referring > to an area and not to the way itself (because we don't have a > dedicated polygon-entity in OSM, we simply add area=yes). > > cheers, > Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
