Grant
While I don't quite understand why the SWG has turned in to the WDWG
(Web Design Working Group) (it does seem to be a bit outside it's
charter ...), I believe Martin issue is with the rampant re-active
instead of pro-active information policy that infects all parts of OSM.
Not that I don't understand some of the reasons for this, but on the
other hand it does, unnecessarily, create a fair amount of animosity.
While we are on the subject of the WDWG (:-)) I would like to point out
that there is at least one complete mock-up of an alternative front page
that many consider superior to what is currently in use. I'll see if I
can find a reference to that later today.
Simon
Am 30.04.2011 14:10, schrieb Grant Slater:
On 30 April 2011 12:56, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer<dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
I noticed that there is a new OSM logo in the wiki. I find it strange
that important things like changing the well established logo of the
project are beeing changed without any discussion or notice on any of
the lists, or did I miss something? Or was the site hacked?
I like the new logo, it is not radically different and is an iterative
improvement from the last.
It was discussed at yesterday's Strategic irc meet:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/SWG_2011-04-29
Also discussed on the strategic list:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/strategic/2011-April/000372.html
Feel free to join the IRC meet, the next one is at Friday 06 May 2011
@ 1600UTC in irc channel #osm-strategic on OFTC, else join via
http://irc.openstreetmap.org/
Regards
Grant
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
