On 23 June 2011 22:20, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) <[email protected]> wrote:
> But I do feel slightly uncomfortable that my edits, which I've now agreed
> should be licensed under ODbL, can currently be used by fosm to build a
> CC-by-SA competitor project which aims to divide our community.

Erm how is this any better than companies sharing ODBL data and
contributions either being exempt from sharing back or not being
accepted because it isn't allowed by the CTs?

Or how many people want OSM-F to run a PD project.

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to