Sorry this was supposed to be copied to legal-talk, not the osm-fork list. Apologies.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:35 PM, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Michael Collinson <m...@ayeltd.biz>wrote: > >> ** >> If it is UK Ordnance Survey data that is the issue, we now have direct >> clarification from them that they have no objection to continued >> distribution of data derived from their OS OpenData under under the ODbL. At >> the moment, this excludes Code-Point Open, (postcode) data. Hope that helps. >> >> > The statement from the OS did not specify what content license was to be > used for their content. They did not explicitly mention that their content > could be included using the DbCL. > > My understanding is that the OpenData license would be the one that was > applicable unless a more permissive license was *explicitly* granted by > them, which it was not. > > Is this a correct reading of how things stand at the moment or have OS > subsequently clarified that they are happy for their content to be licensed > using DbCL within a database that is protected by ODbL? > > > > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
