Richard Weait <richard <at> weait.com> writes:

>If CCv4 ends up being better than ODbL, and agreeable to the osm
>community at large, we could certainly transition to it.

Or indeed add it as an option - while keeping ODbL to stay compatible with 
people
who have started using the map under those terms.

It's not necessarily a case of whether one licence is better than another,
because each may have their strengths and weaknesses for different users of the
data, particularly when it comes to being compatible with other share-alike
projects.

-- 
Ed Avis <e...@waniasset.com>


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to