And that's exactly why we're all here, discussing the issue. So that we can come up with answers regarding: 1) What the exact role of the DWG is 2) How the DWG should go about interacting with the various communities and individual contributors across the globe 3) Whether and how community-established guidelines can interact with global rules
Upon request from the DWG, two French community members have applied to join the ranks of the DWG in order to improve the communication. Would it be possible to get an update on these applications? On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Michael Kugelmann <michaelk_...@gmx.de>wrote: > On 18.10.2012 14:19, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> In the end, we have no choice but to block them; if, even though we >> tried, someone doesn't want to play by the rules then he can't play at all. >> Just because you are not convinced that a certain rule is good, doesn't >> mean it doesn't apply to you. >> > I just can second Frederik! > For me the whole discussion mainly sound like "the French community > against the rest of the world". I don't understand why the French community > is not willing to accept the "sperate account rule for imports": IMHO no > one else worldwide is arguing against it than the french community. But > IMHO it is not acceptable at all that one community is going it's complete > way in basic issues: we are all one/the same project working with the same > data under the same licence which leads to one joined planet! There for > seperate ways are not acceptable and cause problems for the rest of the > world. > My conclusion: seperate ways are not accpetable at all on basic issues. > > > Best regards, > Michael. > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
