On 02/14/2013 05:12 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2013/2/14 Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org>: >>> though I consider the everything=yes trend as namespace pollution. So : >>> - junction=* if there is enough diversity to justify that namespace >>> - highway=junction if junction=yes is going to represent most of the >>> junction=* space >> there is no risk that "yes" would be the most used value, currently >> more than 95% (or 266000) of the values are "roundabout". >> >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/junction#values > junction=crossroads perhaps?
Seems reasonable. So we would have at least... - junction=roundabout - junction=crossroads (unspecified crossroads) And a few more candidates... - junction=yield (to signify an uncontrolled crossroads where the lack of traffic signals in Openstreetmap is not mere neglect) - junction=stop (stop-controlled crossroads - which could be part of a relation linking the junction node with the positions of the actual stop signs) - junction=traffic_signals (which could be part of a relation linking the junction node with the positions of the actual traffic signals) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
