Am 31/mar/2013 um 20:56 schrieb ingalls <nicholas.inga...@gmail.com>: > I'll check if they actually represent areas of high-res imagery, if they > don't, I'll remove them. If they still represent areas of high res imagery > I'll grandfather them until they become outdated. > > Sound reasonable to everyone? +1 cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
- [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary? ingalls
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary? ingalls
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary? Clay Smalley
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary? Janko Mihelić
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary? Maarten Deen
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary? Florian Lohoff
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundar... ingalls
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Bou... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Bou... Jaakko Helleranta.com
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Bou... Florian Lohoff
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundar... Maarten Deen
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Boundar... Stephan Knauss
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Bou... Pieren
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery... Stephan Knauss
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery... ingalls
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery Bou... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery... Stephan Knauss
- Re: [OSM-talk] Imagery... Martin Koppenhoefer