Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
Btw.: how many boundaries shall we tolerate?
How much of your mapping shall I tolerate? It's always the same answer. Pay respect to other mappers. If the data is of use to other mappers, respect it. Even if you would not map it this way. I personally thing that mapping of underground power lines doe snot belong into OSM. But I do not delete them. And i don't maintain them. Using imagery to support mapping has gained a lot of importance over the last few years. That much that we changed our OSM flyer to highlight it as a foundation for data along with GPS tracks. If the need for more sophisticated tool support rises maybe different solutions will come up. recently there are projects providing offset details, editors might display boundaries by default soon. This is all work in progress. Years back when Bing allowed us to use their imagery we did not have any of this available. So storing a few hundred extra ways in the database had been the easiest and most practical solution. The way do no harm to anybody. So just keep them for a while until all functionality has been migrated to different tools. If you really want to clean up data have a look at the discontinued "Schlecker" markets...
Stephan

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to