On 05/24/2013 06:15 AM, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I don't regularly use iD myself (JOSM user), but, on behalf of its
developers: negative comments like this are unhelpful and denigrate
the vast amount of hard work that has gone into producing the editor.
If you don't like it, complain about it to your friends in private,
change the code, but do not slag it off on a public mailing list!
Nick
-----razor74 <radulescu.raz...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
From: razor74 <radulescu.raz...@gmail.com>
Date: 24/05/2013 09:36AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] iD Editor live on OpenStreetMap
The worst editor ewer. With this will result many damages and
incompatibilities. From newbies ofcourse. Potlatch is the best blend for
advanced users and for new ones with alot of info and very friendly
interface. This is a joke. Take it down before destroyed the existent maps
with alot of hard work on them!
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/iD-Editor-live-on-OpenStreetMap-tp5760198p5760219.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
So, you feel that non-programmers, who have justified reasons to
complain about the design, such as the silent removal of highway tags,
should not be able to let their opinion of the bad design be made known?
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
