Am 07.06.2013 14:26, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > > > 2013/6/7 Christoph Bünte <christ...@sozialhelden.de > <mailto:christ...@sozialhelden.de>> > > Hi everyone, > > we at wheelmap.org <http://wheelmap.org> want to take our service to > the next level by tagging public places wether there is an > wheelchair accessible toilet or not. To start the discussion we > prepared an key proposal: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/wheelchair:toilet > > Please let us know what you think about it.
There is a little typo under "applies to" first word. > > the proposal looks reasonable at first glance, if you see this as an > attribute to something (and it will definitely be easier to evaluate > this way). An alternative might be to tag explicitly the toilet and add > wheelchair tags to the toilet. > > I checked with tag info and there are already tags in use: > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/toilets > e.g. > wheelchair:*toilets* > <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wheelchair%3Atoilets> > *toilets*:wheelchair > <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/toilets%3Awheelchair> > > the suggestion for a toilet attribute on a POI according > to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets is > "toilets", that's why I suggest you change the wording in your proposal > to plural. IMHO the most logical way would be toilets:wheelchair=yes/no > but wheelchair:toilets is currently used far more often. +1, for toilets:wheelchair=0-100, or even toilets:wheelchair:female=1 fly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
