Hi, > Please, do not offer a delete function that prominent !
This has come up before. Where should this action button move? Or should there be an alert message? How to resolve this with pro users who get angry with how hidden or alert-messaged the functionality is? Would welcome feedback here beyond the simple negative. For what it's worth, the "Delete key" which is mapped in JOSM and P2 as well, is also pretty easy to hit, and the trash icon in JOSM is even larger than the trash in iD, just positioned differently. > Forward/backward/left/right are established prefixes, values and roles and I expect developers to know about it, especially if the software is quite new. Please search for, link to, or comment on an issue. Here it is: https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/299 We cannot rehash and respond to all issues in iD, without context, on every thread that relates to it. Please search and use the issue tracker for bugs, as you would do with any other open source project. Tom On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, colliar <colliar4e...@aol.com> wrote: > On 16.08.2013 15:39, Tom MacWright wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Now as ever is a good time to post bug reports and suggestions to the > > issue tracker, where developers can see, act, and respond to them: > > > >> https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues > > Another website with another login and no option for anonymous reports. > Why is it not using trac.osm.org or at least some OSM domain ? > > Sorry, I usually do not use ID but I do reporting JOSM bugs. > > The two issues where mentioned the last time we were talking about ID on > this list and if people are either developing or testing they should > have noticed already. > > > If you have any question as far as 'what is in the latest version of iD' > > or 'is X fixed or not', you can as always, use the testing instance that > > has the absolute latest code to find out yourself: > > > >> > http://openstreetmap.us/iD/master/#background=Bing&map=20.00/-77.02271/38.90085 > > This instance is really slow with iceweasel ! > > The two issues are not fixed ! > Why didn't you mention this ? > > Forward/backward/left/right are established prefixes, values and roles > and I expect developers to know about it, especially if the software is > quite new. > > > Also, as always, it's a great time to be objective and constructive in > > your criticism. > > Please, do not offer a delete function that prominent ! > > Please, fully support forward/backward/left/right as part of the key and > value, and appropriate adjust them when changing direction of a way and > combining ways. Forward/backward as roles need to be adjusted, as well, > with these two actions. > > As long as this is not fixed, deny to combine or change directions on > any way. > > Thanks a lot ! > > Cheers > colliar > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
