Pieren, we are discussing whether or not to make iD the default editor. While you are welcome to hold your own opinions regarding services such as Facebook and Twitter, the material point that you raised by mentioning them is whether they add to or harm the project. I haven't heard you mention any issues with these features beyond your distaste for the services themselves, so I suggest we drop the issue and get back to focusing on the idea of iD as default editor.
Thanks, Kathleen On Aug 17, 2013 6:37 PM, "Pieren" <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Kathleen Danielson > <kathleen.daniel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I actually love the social features in iD. > > It is strange to see that some are trying to escape from google maps > controling (geo)data just to fall down immediatly to other companies > controling data (privacy).... > > > you could have and should have searched the issue tracker > > None of them suggesting to change this as opt-in instead of opt-out. > Marketing I guess ? Any plan for the "fb like" and "g+" buttons near > the changesets history tab ? > > And I'm surprised that iD is asking to modify my OSM user preferences. > I understand the read access but not the write access. > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
