On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:13:34PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2013/11/20 Peter Wendorff <wendo...@uni-paderborn.de> > I agree, but what will we do on a practical level? I checked a dozen > arbitrary nodes and apparently nobody has cleaned up any of these in the > past 4 years: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3118180 > and we are talking about 24174 nodes. > > What is the general opinion on putting all those int_names (ideally only > those with more than one value, but how do you check this?) into a new > temporary tag "fixme:int_name" like Peter suggested? Or are there 241 > people interested in solving this manually, so everybody only has to > check/fix 100 items?
As the order on the int_names might have changed due to edits afterwards i'd be very careful to convert them automatically to the name:<languagecode> version which is the right way to do it. If one could reconstruct the order/tag from the original import and its the same all the time i'd vote for changing them. That nobody cared in 4 years is not an argument to delete it or change it. Probably people have been happy with the results of nominatim which parses it? Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
