2014-03-15 11:22 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > Do you know of any case where OSMF did more than write a letter?
Just being curious: Do you - or anybody else - know of any specific case where G* wrote more than a letter? --S. 2014-03-15 11:22 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > >> Am 14/mar/2014 um 09:48 schrieb Norbert Wenzel >> <norbert.wenzel.li...@gmail.com>: >> >> And to the topic. It might not always be easy to enforce the >> share-alike clause, but I really like the fact that we have it and may >> enforce it if necessary. > > > actually it seems we won't enforce it upon people who don't follow the share > alike provisions, probably not even the attribution obligations will be > "enforced". > > Do you know of any case where OSMF did more than write a letter? Uses of osm > without attribution are revealed every now and then but never has happened > something (read: attempt to enforce the license) substantial whether they > added attribution and declared share alike or not. e.g. MS could continue to > distribute tainted aerials for months if not years, apple does so for at > least 2 years, the wiki has a long but quite incomplete list of others: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/License_violation > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
