For consistency sake, seems like relations are the way to go, even in one route instances. On Aug 22, 2014 10:08 AM, "Pieren" <pier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What did you mean with this? Do you suggest we use relations when there > are > > multiple refs, and ways when there is only one ref? > > Yes. It's just a pragmatic approach : I use relations only if I have > no easier alternative. Like a building : if it's a simple polygon, I > don't use relations. If it has a courtyard, I create a multipolygon > relation. In other words, it's not because some buildings need a > multipolygon relation that we should create a multipolygon relation > for each building. > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk