On 07/10/2014, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Is that everyone else's understanding too ? In that case, I'll mention >> that fact in the template's documentation, and keep an eye out for >> misdocumented tags. > > I think it is very confusing for new comers. The description uses the > OSM primitives vocabular "node", "way", "relation" where the "area" is > mixing them. It could be improved by saying "point" instead of node, > or "linear" instead of way (until the area becomes a real OSM > primitive) and "relational" for the relation. Just a proposal.
I agree with this, but it's quite a bit more work, and introducing new standard vocabulary to OSM isn't for the faint of heart. <captain_hindsight>We should've had a proper area primitive in OSM since the beginning.</captain_hindsight> _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
