On 07/10/2014, moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/10/2014, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think it is very confusing for new comers. The description uses the >> OSM primitives vocabular "node", "way", "relation" where the "area" is >> mixing them. It could be improved by saying "point" instead of node, >> or "linear" instead of way (until the area becomes a real OSM >> primitive) and "relational" for the relation. Just a proposal. > > I agree with this, but it's quite a bit more work, and introducing new > standard vocabulary to OSM isn't for the faint of heart.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SemanticElements is a quick attempt at this. Template:DescriptionLang could point there instead of towards Elements. Not sure how good an idea it is. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
