If you reread the original mail, then you'll see he already tried this himself and it did not work.

On 27-04-15 10:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
FWIW, I just wanted to fix the situation to give you an example, and
someone else was faster, it is already fixed in the way I did suggest
above: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.45290/-1.48908

Cheers,
Martin



_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


--
---
m.v.g.,
Cartinus

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to