On 3/06/2015 10:37 AM, Tom MacWright wrote:
Hi Mike,
Please propose an alternative.
He has been .. on other threads..
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com
<mailto:sea...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Jun 3, 2015 8:06 AM, "pmailkeey ." <pmailk...@googlemail.com
<mailto:pmailk...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
> OSM's k=v design is completely a serious and unnecessary flaw.
[...] OSM is 90% argument, 5% dead-end discussions and 5%
progress. The whole is not a marketable product; it's not fit to
be rated as 'beta'. Is this a significant cause of ex-mappers ?
It's a flipping brilliant project but sadly lacking a great leader.
It seems you are deeply unsatisfied with how OSM works. And your
broad assertions such as that OSM is "not fit" or is "90%
argument" are completely unfounded. Sure, OSM is not perfect but I
seriously doubt that the k=v design or some other point you have
raised is the culprit.
Feel free to leave and create a separate project. You can even be
the "great leader" for that new project that you think OSM needs.
If your ideas are indeed better, then your project will succeed
and you can then prove OSM wrong.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
