Éric Gillet wrote: > That would be slightly faster to execute than the first approach I was > suggesting, but then how would you prove that you checked every > and all features ?
Well, the best way to prove that you checked everything is not to fuck things up, which of course you won't, because you've checked everything. If you fuck things up (for example, by changing name=McDonalds to name=McDonald's on an independent restaurant that is actually called McDonalds), then by definition you haven't checked sufficiently, have you? Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Automated-edits-code-of-conduct-tp5877825p5878305.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
