The essential discussion here is -- OSM communities can put together plans
ahead of this redaction, in order to minimize impact to the map. With
sufficient legal process. This seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to plan
out, rather than doing a large scale revert and scrambling to clean up after.
The chdr problem has been with us for years. There is little risk in giving
slightly more time to plan ahead. Perhaps that is best done country by country.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Monday, August 28, 2017 7:06 AM, Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de>
wrote:
On Monday 28 August 2017, Greg Morgan wrote:
> We do get to go through the five stages. We do get to express the
> emotions until acceptance of our fate as part of the healing process.
> There is no rubber stamping!
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model
You are free to express your emotions but I think you are overreaching
here with comparing a redaction of data in OSM to the grief over a
serious personal loss.
In case this was not clear the term 'healed' as i used it was referring
to the legal concept of healing a breach of contract or other legal
infractions by ceasing some activity or doing something you neglected
to do before.
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
