> El 25 sept 2017, a las 10:54, Imre Samu <pella.s...@gmail.com> escribió:. > > What about the other alternatives? > > for example: > - just adding ALL (official[1]) dual languages for only Z0-Z8 level, and > keeping the current design for Z9-Z19 > > so there will be (z0-z8) > - local + english > - local + chinese > - local + arabic > - local + japanese > - local + russian > - local + german > - local + spanish > - ... > - local + greek > - local + hungarian > - local + .... > - .....
This is 262144 more tiles *per language*. Who wants to donate a few disks? > > And the other question: Adding the English language now - can be > counterproductive for implementing the full multi-language support? ( for > example - less urgency?) That sounds like an argument against any incremental improvement ever. Wouldn't your proposed multilingual tiles cause less urgency for vector tiles too? > Imre > /native Hungarian/ > > > > 2017-09-25 13:48 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl>: >> On 25 September 2017 at 13:21, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> >> wrote: >> > Frederik Ramm wrote: >> >> I'd invest the available brainpower in steps needed to achieve >> >> this goal, even if it's a year or two in the future. >> > >> > Which means vector tiles... which we should be looking at anyway. >> > >> > But that needs to be a separate project really, rather than a facet of >> > openstreetmap-carto. >> >> Yes, to re-iterate: my question is about things we can do now. Vector >> tiles are on the horizon, but are likely to take a year or more from >> now. Changing some of the labels is something we could do with one >> line of code and roll out tomorrow, if we wanted to. >> >> -- Matthijs >> >>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
