Safwat, You are not helping things by unilaterally reverting things and accusing people of vandalism after you asked HOT to look into it.
At this point all I have seen from your first list was some newbie edits with some newbie mistakes and some stuff that looked totally fine when using the correct imagery. and before you started reverting all of the andrew users work, I saw decent mapping and bad tagging from a new mapper. clearly not vandalism. Granted I am not the best at reviewing things by changeset so I might have missed something, that is totally possible. At this point I am going to stop looking into it since you have decided to take matters into your own hands with your own solutions. Regards, Blake On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Safwat Halaby <swiftf...@gmx.com> wrote: > > Due to a mailing client config error, I'm unsure if I sent my > messages privately or to the list (or at all). At the risk of repeating > myself: > > The problems are not related to Imagery at all. They're blatantly > obvious mapping issues like: > - removing things and re-adding them for no apparent reason > - Adding buildings on top of pre-existing buildings > - Adding closed ways with area=yes instead of building=yes, or with no > tags at all > - Intentional vandalism in some cases. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- ---------------------------------------------------- Blake Girardot OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot skype: jblakegirardot Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
