Haha I promise I won’t be offended. I welcome the criticism - this is part of working on something that matters to a lot of people.
Anyway, iD already does train the user in the walkthrough how to assign tags, and iD does warn the user on the save screen if they are uploading untagged features. So, what would you prefer iD do.. Just not upload untagged things? We could do this, and I don’t have any strong opinion one way or another. In the past, the thinking has been that it’s better to accept an imperfect contribution than to turn away an imperfect contributor. The map is used for a lot of things these days - so maybe we should rethink this as a community how we handle obviously bad edits. Bryan > On Oct 29, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, it's amazing that after all these years of reporting it, that BUG in iD > still hasn't been resolved. But don't dare to complain, we might offend Bryan. > > Polyglot > > 2017-10-29 23:47 GMT+01:00 Mark Wagner <mark+...@carnildo.com > <mailto:mark+...@carnildo.com>>: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 22:15:18 +0200 > Safwat Halaby <swiftf...@gmx.com <mailto:swiftf...@gmx.com>> wrote: > > > - Adding closed ways with area=yes instead of building=yes, or with no > > tags at all > > A closed way with "area=yes" is a *very* common newbie mistake with iD: > the user traced an area, then forgot to tag it, or didn't realize they > needed to apply additional tags. > > -- > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
