You can also use OSM inspector to find untagged ways: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-1.25144&lat=5.12425&zoom=13&opacity=0.63&overlays=ways_without_tags
and it's of course the better option instead of adding load to Overpass API. Polyglot 2017-10-30 2:47 GMT+01:00 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>: > Untagged ways in a bbox: > > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sFU > > way({{bbox}})(if:count_tags()==0)->.w1; > rel(bw.w1);way(r)->.w2; > (.w1; - .w2;); > (._; >;); > out meta; > > Michael beat me to the answer for the other query. Way too many comes near > as an answer. > > Jo > > > 2017-10-30 2:01 GMT+01:00 john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>: > >> Many of the untagged ways are from JOSM and that warns before uploading >> as well. >> >> Out of curiosity does any one have a count of the number of untagged ways >> and area=yes in the database? >> >> Thanks John >> >> On 29 Oct 2017 8:53 pm, "Bryan Housel" <br...@7thposition.com> wrote: >> >>> Haha I promise I won’t be offended. I welcome the criticism - this is >>> part of working on something that matters to a lot of people. >>> >>> Anyway, iD already does train the user in the walkthrough how to assign >>> tags, and iD does warn the user on the save screen if they are uploading >>> untagged features. >>> >>> So, what would you prefer iD do.. Just not upload untagged things? We >>> could do this, and I don’t have any strong opinion one way or another. >>> >>> In the past, the thinking has been that it’s better to accept an >>> imperfect contribution than to turn away an imperfect contributor. The >>> map is used for a lot of things these days - so maybe we should rethink >>> this as a community how we handle obviously bad edits. >>> >>> Bryan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 29, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, it's amazing that after all these years of reporting it, that BUG >>> in iD still hasn't been resolved. But don't dare to complain, we might >>> offend Bryan. >>> >>> Polyglot >>> >>> 2017-10-29 23:47 GMT+01:00 Mark Wagner <mark+...@carnildo.com>: >>> >>>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 22:15:18 +0200 >>>> Safwat Halaby <swiftf...@gmx.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> > - Adding closed ways with area=yes instead of building=yes, or with no >>>> > tags at all >>>> >>>> A closed way with "area=yes" is a *very* common newbie mistake with iD: >>>> the user traced an area, then forgot to tag it, or didn't realize they >>>> needed to apply additional tags. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> talk mailing list >>>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >>> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk